In brief
- Regulation: AI Act.
- Organisers deploying biometric devices or smart cameras are deployers; software vendors are providers.
- Qualify the devices.
- Prohibiting unauthorised biometrics.
- Ensure transparency.
- Up to €35M or 7% for prohibited practices, in addition to GDPR risk on biometric data.
Regulatory deadlines
The key dates of this regulation.
August 2024
Entry into force
In forceFebruary 2025
Ban on prohibited practices
In forceAugust 2025
General-purpose AI models (GPAI) & governance
In forceAugust 2026
High-risk system obligations (Annex III)
In forceAugust 2027
High-risk embedded in products (Annex I)
UpcomingWhat does the AI Act cover?
The AI Act places strong restrictions on real-time remote biometric identification in publicly accessible spaces and regulates biometric categorisation. Facial recognition for access control falls within this highly sensitive scope; biometric data is also sensitive data under the GDPR.
Crowd-analysis cameras call for the same level of caution.
Is the 'Events' sector affected?
Organisers deploying biometric devices or smart cameras are deployers; publishers are providers. Maximum caution is required.
Standard access systems (ticketing, QR codes) do not fall under this regime.
Detailed obligations
Qualifying devices
Identify any use of biometrics or smart cameras.
Prohibit unauthorised biometrics.
Ruling out facial recognition for access control outside a strict framework.
Ensure transparency
Inform about the use of AI and video.
Articulate with GDPR
Treat biometric data as sensitive data (exception, DPIA).
Sanctions & risks
Up to €35M or 7% for prohibited practices, in addition to GDPR risk relating to biometric data. A poorly framed biometric system significantly exposes the organiser.
Application timeline
- 1Entry into force. 1 August 2024.
- 2Prohibitions. Biometric restrictions since February 2025.
Common mistakes in the sector
- 1Hazardous biometrics. Deploying access facial recognition without a framework.
- 2Non-qualified cameras. Using smart cameras without analysis.
- 3Absent transparency. Failing to disclose AI usage.
- 4GDPR ignored. Overlook the sensitivity of biometric data.
Practical case
An event organiser was considering facial recognition to speed up access. Given the AI Act restrictions and GDPR sensitivity, they opted for named QR codes and conventional access control, ruling out any biometric processing.
Compliance roadmap
- 1
Inventory. Identify the planned systems.
- 2
Qualify. Identifying biometric use cases.
- 3
Exclude. Prohibiting unauthorised biometrics.
- 4
Alternatives. Prioritise ticketing and QR codes.
- 5
Articulate. Handle biometrics under GDPR.
Frequently asked questions
It is heavily regulated, or even prohibited depending on the context; best avoided as a general rule.
Take action on AI Act
Free assessment or a chat with an expert dedicated to events.
They already trust us
See how organisations in the events sector secured their compliance with DCO.