In brief
- Regulation: AI Act.
- Organisations deploying AI assessment tools are deployers; the software vendor is the provider.
- Qualify use cases.
- Conducting an FRIA.
- Supervise.
- Up to €35M or 7% for prohibited practices and €15M or 3% for high risk, in addition to GDPR exposure.
Regulatory deadlines
The key dates of this regulation.
August 2024
Entry into force
In forceFebruary 2025
Ban on prohibited practices
In forceAugust 2025
General-purpose AI models (GPAI) & governance
In forceAugust 2026
High-risk system obligations (Annex III)
In forceAugust 2027
High-risk embedded in products (Annex I)
UpcomingWhat does the AI Act cover?
As in the public sector, AI assessing eligibility for essential social benefits may be classified as high-risk. Uses related to planning or administrative assistance generally fall under limited risk.
The vulnerability of audiences makes bias control and human oversight particularly critical.
Is the 'Medico-social' sector concerned?
Organisations deploying evaluation AI are deployers; the software vendor is the provider. Some deployers must carry out a FRIA.
Purely organisational uses fall under lighter regimes, while still remaining subject to GDPR.
Detailed obligations
Qualify use cases
Isolating AI from access to benefits (potentially high risk).
Conduct a FRIA
Analyse the impact on the rights of supported individuals.
Supervise
Ensuring effective human decision-making.
Control biases
Preventing any discrimination against vulnerable audiences.
Articulate with GDPR
Coordinating FRIA and DPIA.
Sanctions & risks
Up to €35M or 7% for prohibited practices and €15M or 3% for high risk, in addition to GDPR risk. A biased access AI affects vulnerable individuals.
Application timeline
- 1Entry into force. 1 August 2024.
- 2High risk. From 2 August 2026 for access to benefits.
Common mistakes in the sector
- 1High risk denied. Treating an access AI as an administrative tool.
- 2FRIA omitted. Fail to analyse the impact on rights.
- 3Uncontrolled biases. Discriminating against vulnerable audiences.
- 4Superficial oversight. Mechanically validating decisions.
Practical case
An organisation is piloting an AI tool for pre-assessing eligibility for a benefit. As a potentially high-risk use case, it conducts a FRIA, provides for enhanced human oversight and controls for bias, in conjunction with the DPIA.
Compliance roadmap
- 1
Inventory. Map AI uses.
- 2
Qualify. Isolate high risk.
- 3
FRIA/DPIA. Carry out the analyses.
- 4
Frame. Oversight and bias control.
- 5
Monitor. Post-market monitoring and reassessment.
Frequently asked questions
If it conditions access to essential services, it may be.
Take action on AI Act
Free assessment or a chat with an expert dedicated to medico-social.
They already trust us
See how organisations in the medico-social sector secured their compliance with DCO.